Slavery and the American Civil War
The U.S philosophical and political Manifest destiny belief played a key role expanding U.S territories through to Pacific Ocean region so as to accommodate the rapidly increasing population as well as furthering its interests in slavery. In 1820, U.S passed the Missouri compromise to define the free (north) and slave (south) states especially for their admission into the union. Later, the compromise of 1850 was formulated to establish more slavery laws as well as barring the trade in slaves in Washington, D.C (Lawrence 203). This compromise led to the entrance of California (neither a free or slave state) into the union as a free state. However, the Fugitive Act passed alongside the compromise of 1850 enhanced slavery by allowing the slave states to reclaim their runaway slaves in the free sates. This Act promoted brutality on both free blacks and the slaves as bunky hunters got in the trade. The 1840s doctrine of popular sovereignty gave the settlers in the new territorial lands the capacity to determine whether these states would be free or slave states. This idea was popularized by the 1854s Stephen Douglas Kansas-Nebraska Act. Lincolns 1860 election prompted the formation of a separate union-the Confederate States of America as a rebellion to Lincoln (Lawrence 245). This was due to slavery issues enhanced by leadership failure. Struggle for control over federal forts especially Fort Sumter initiated the civil war. Both the south and the north could have done better to avoid what became one of the bloodiest U.S wars. A number of laws such as the Fugitive Act could have been reviewed or avoided for the sake of unity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment